In this article

Binary search is an efficient algorithm used to find a target value within a sorted array. It operates with a time complexity of **O(log n)** in both average and worst-case scenarios. This efficiency stems from its divide-and-conquer approach, where the search range is halved with each comparison.

**Here’s how it works:** Binary search starts with two pointers, low and high, marking the boundaries of the search range. It calculates the mid-point and compares the target value to the element at this mid-point. If the target is less than the mid-point value, the search continues in the lower half; if greater, it continues in the upper half. This process repeats, effectively reducing the search space by half each time.

**Best Case:** The target value is located at the mid-point on the first comparison, resulting in a time complexity of **O(1)**. **Average and Worst Case:** Regardless of the target’s position, the algorithm performs **O(log n)** comparisons. The space complexity is **O(1)** for iterative implementations and **O(log n)** for recursive implementations due to stack space usage. Binary search’s efficiency makes it ideal for large, sorted datasets compared to linear search’s **O(n)** complexity.

The time complexity of the binary search is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn). Here’s a detailed explanation of how this complexity is derived and why binary search is efficient:

**Binary Search Algorithm**:

**Prerequisite**: The array or list must be sorted.

**Process**:

**Initialization**: Set pointers or indices for the start (low) and end (high) of the search interval.

**Compute Middle Index**: Calculate the middle index (mid) of the current search interval.

**Comparison**: Compare the target value with the middle element:

- If the target is equal to the middle element, return the index.

- If the target is less, adjust the high pointer to search the left half.

- If the target is greater, adjust the low pointer to search the right half.

**Repeat**: Continue the process with the updated low and high until the target is found or the search interval is empty.

**1. Search Space Reduction**:

- In each step of binary search, the size of the search interval is halved. If the search space starts with nnn elements, it is reduced to n/2n/2n/2 after one step, n/4n/4n/4 after two steps, n/8n/8n/8 after three steps, and so on.

- This halving continues until the search space is reduced to a single element or the target is found.

**2. Number of Steps**:

- The number of times the array can be halved is proportional to the logarithm of the array size. Specifically, it is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, where nnn is the number of elements in the array.

- Each step divides the search space in half, so the number of steps needed to reach a single element (or to confirm the absence of the target) is log2n\log_2 nlog2n.

**3. Mathematical Derivation**:

- To find the maximum number of steps required, solve the equation: n2k≤1\frac{n}{2^k} \leq 12kn≤1 where K is the number of steps required. Rearranging gives: 2k≥n2^k \geq n2k≥n. Taking the logarithm (base 2) of both sides, we get k≥log2nk \geq \log_2 nk≥log2n. Thus, the number of steps kkk is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn).

Here's a detailed analysis of both time and space complexity for the binary search algorithm, including explanations for both the iterative and recursive versions:

Time complexity measures the efficiency of an algorithm by assessing how the runtime grows with the input size. For binary search, this metric is crucial as it reflects the algorithm's ability to handle large datasets efficiently. Binary search operates on a sorted array, using a divide-and-conquer strategy to locate a target value or determine its absence quickly.

**1. Best Case (O(1)):** In the best-case scenario, binary search finds the target value immediately at the mid-point of the array. This requires only a single comparison, making the time complexity **O(1)**. The algorithm achieves its optimal performance when the target is perfectly aligned with the mid-point on the first attempt.

**2. Average Case (O(log n)):** On average, binary search performs **O(log n)** comparisons. Each step halves the search range, leading to logarithmic time complexity. This efficiency holds across various positions of the target within the sorted array, as the algorithm consistently reduces the problem size exponentially.

**3. Worst Case (O(log n)):** In the worst-case scenario, binary search also operates with **O(log n)** complexity. This occurs when the target value is not present, requiring the algorithm to explore the entire search range. Despite this, the logarithmic reduction of the search space ensures that the time complexity remains logarithmic.

**4. Binary Search** operates on a sorted array by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half until the target value is found or the search interval is empty.

**1. Iterative Version**:

**Steps**: In each iteration, the algorithm halves the search space.

**Time Complexity**: O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn)

**Explanation**:

- The array of size nnn is reduced to n/2n/2n/2 after the first iteration, n/4n/4n/4 after the second, and so on.

- The number of iterations needed to reduce the array to a single element is proportional to the logarithm of the array size (base 2), which is log2n\log_2 nlog2n. This results in O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) time complexity.

**2. Recursive Version**:

**Steps**: In each recursive call, the search space is halved.

**Time Complexity**: O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn)

**Explanation**:

- Similar to the iterative version, the array size is halved with each recursive call.

- The maximum depth of the recursion is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, leading to O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) time complexity.

Space complexity measures the amount of extra memory an algorithm requires relative to the input size. For binary search, this metric helps evaluate the algorithm's memory efficiency. Space complexity can vary based on whether the binary search is implemented iteratively or recursively.

**1. Iterative Implementation (O(1)):** The iterative version of binary search has a space complexity of **O(1)**. It uses a fixed amount of extra space regardless of the input size. The only additional memory required is for a few variables (low, high, mid, and the target value), making it highly space-efficient.

**2. Recursive Implementation (O(log n)):** The recursive version of binary search has a space complexity of **O(log n)**. Each recursive call adds a new layer to the call stack, and the maximum depth of recursion is proportional to the logarithm of the number of elements. Consequently, the space required for the call stack grows logarithmically with the input size.

**3. Space Complexity** measures the amount of memory used by the algorithm, including space for variables and function calls.

**Iterative Version**:

**Space Complexity**: O(1)O(1)O(1)

**Explanation**:

- The iterative binary search uses a fixed number of variables (low, high, mid), regardless of the input size.

- The space required for these variables does not scale with the size of the input array, resulting in constant space complexity.

**Recursive Version**:

**Space Complexity**: O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn)

**Explanation**:

- Each recursive call adds a new frame to the call stack.

- The maximum depth of the recursion is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, which is the height of the call stack.

- Therefore, the space required for the call stack is proportional to the depth of recursion, resulting in O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) space complexity.

The time complexity of operations in a Binary Search Tree (BST) can be influenced by several factors, primarily related to the tree's structure and balance. Here are key factors that affect the time complexity:

**Impact:**The height of the BST directly affects the time complexity of operations like search, insertion, and deletion.

**Details:**In a balanced BST, the height is**O(log n)**, leading to efficient operations. In a skewed BST (where nodes are inserted in a sorted order), the height can become**O(n)**, making operations less efficient.

**Impact:**Tree balance influences how well the tree maintains its height.

**Details:**Self-balancing trees, like AVL trees or Red-Black trees, ensure the height remains**O(log n)**, optimizing operation time. Non-self-balancing trees may degrade to**O(n)**in the worst case.

**Impact:**The order of node insertions affects tree structure and balance.

**Details:**Sequential or sorted insertions can lead to a skewed tree, while random insertions generally result in a more balanced tree. Balanced insertion strategies or using self-balancing trees can mitigate this effect.

**Impact:**Handling duplicates affects tree structure and operations.

**Details:**Some BST implementations do not allow duplicate values, while others handle them differently (e.g., placing duplicates in a specific direction). This can affect the height and, thus, the complexity of operations.

**Impact:**Variations in tree structure, such as the presence of subtrees or uneven distribution of nodes, affect performance.

**Details:**Trees with uneven distributions or deep subtrees can lead to inefficient operations. A well-structured tree ensures better time complexity for various operations.

**Impact:**Strategies for rebalancing a BST affect its operational efficiency.

**Details:**Algorithms that periodically rebalance the tree (such as those in AVL or Red-Black trees) help maintain optimal height and time complexity. Lack of rebalancing can lead to degraded performance.

The time complexity of operations in a BST is greatly influenced by the tree's height and balance, which in turn are affected by the insertion order, handling of duplicates, and structural characteristics.

Binary search is a highly efficient algorithm for finding an element in a sorted array or list. Its best-case time complexity is an important aspect to consider when analyzing its performance.

The best-case time complexity of binary search occurs when the target element is located at the middle index of the array on the very first comparison.

**Initial Comparison**: In this scenario, you find the target element during the first check, so you only need to perform one comparison.

**Time Complexity**: Since you only make a single comparison in the best case, the time complexity is O(1)O(1)O(1).

**1. Initialization:**

- You start with a sorted array or list and two pointers or indices: low (initially set to 0) and high (initially set to the length of the array minus one).

**2. Find Middle Index:**

- The middle index mid is calculated as: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high

- In many programming languages, this is done using integer division to avoid fractional indices.

**3. Compare and Adjust:**

**If**the element at index mid is equal to the target value, the search is successful, and you return the index mid.

**If**the target value is less than the element at index mid, you adjust the high pointer to mid - 1 and continue the search in the left half of the array.

**If**the target value is greater than the element at index mid, you adjust the low pointer to mid + 1 and continue the search in the right half of the array.

In the best-case scenario, the target element is located precisely at the middle index of the array on the very first check. Here’s why this is the best case:

**1. Single Comparison:**

- On the first iteration of the binary search algorithm, you calculate the middle index and compare the middle element with the target value.

- If the middle element is the target, you have found the target immediately without needing to adjust the low or high pointers or make additional comparisons.

**2. Time Complexity Analysis:**

- The time complexity of this best-case scenario is determined by the number of operations needed to find the target.

- Since you find the target with just one comparison and no further adjustments or divisions of the array are needed, the time complexity is constant, denoted as O(1)O(1)O(1).

**Fixed Number of Steps:**In the best case, the number of steps (comparisons) needed to find the element does not depend on the size of the array. You perform exactly one comparison regardless of whether the array has 10 elements or 10,000 elements.

**No Additional Operations:**There are no additional operations required to search further or adjust the search space. The search terminates immediately.

Consider a sorted array: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and you are searching for the target value 3.

**Initial state:**

- low = 0

- high = 4

- Middle index calculation: mid=0+42=2\text{mid} = \frac{0 + 4}{2} = 2mid=20+4=2

- The element at index 2 is 3, which is the target value.

Since the target is found in the first comparison at index 2, the time complexity of this operation is O(1)O(1)O(1).

To understand the average-case time complexity of binary search, it’s important to consider how binary search behaves across a typical set of input scenarios rather than focusing solely on the best or worst cases.

Binary search is used to find a target value within a sorted array by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. The core steps of the binary search algorithm are:

**1. Initialization**: Set low to 0 and high to the length of the array minus one.

**2. Calculate Middle Index**: Compute mid as: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high

**3. Comparison**:

- If the element at mid is the target, return mid.

- If the target is less than the element at mid, adjust high to mid - 1.

- If the target is greater than the element at mid, adjust low to mid + 1.

**4. Repeat**: Continue the process until the target is found or the search interval is empty.

The average-case time complexity of binary search describes the expected number of comparisons needed when searching for an element in a sorted array.

**1. Number of Comparisons**:

- In each iteration, binary search halves the search space. Therefore, the maximum number of iterations required to find an element or determine its absence is proportional to the number of times the array can be divided by 2.

**2. Mathematical Representation**:

- If the array has nnn elements, the search space is reduced to n2\frac{n}{2}2n, n4\frac{n}{4}4n, and so on, until it becomes 1. The number of times you can halve nnn is approximately log2n\log_2 nlog2n.

- Therefore, the number of comparisons required to locate an element or determine it’s not in the array is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn).

**3. Deriving Average-Case Complexity**:

**Balanced Search**: Binary search always performs O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) comparisons, regardless of whether the element is present or not. This is because each step halves the search space.

**Distribution of Comparisons**: Since each possible search scenario (finding the element or determining its absence) will involve roughly log2n\log_2 nlog2n comparisons in the average case, the average-case time complexity remains O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn).

Consider a sorted array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], and you are searching for a random target value. For each potential target value, the number of comparisons is consistent with the logarithmic pattern:

**Finding 1**: Requires a maximum of 3 comparisons.

**Finding 2**: Requires a maximum of 2 comparisons.

**Finding 3**: Requires a maximum of 2 comparisons.

**Finding 4**: Requires a maximum of 2 comparisons.

**Finding 5**: Requires a maximum of 3 comparisons.

In general, regardless of where the target is located, the number of comparisons follows a logarithmic pattern, which aligns with O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn).

The worst-case time complexity of the binary search is a crucial aspect to understand as it highlights the maximum amount of time required to complete the search operation in the least favorable scenario. Let’s explore this in detail.

Binary search operates on a sorted array and follows these steps:

**1. Initialization**: Set the low pointer to 0 and the high pointer to the last index of the array.

**2. Middle Index Calculation**: Compute the middle index mid as: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high

**3. Comparison**:

- If the element at index mid equals the target, the search is successful.

- If the target is less than the element at index mid, adjust high to mid - 1 and search the left half.

- If the target is greater than the element at index mid, adjust low to mid + 1 and search the right half.

**4. Repeat**: Continue this process until the target is found or the search space is empty.

The worst-case time complexity describes the scenario where binary search has to perform the maximum number of comparisons before either finding the target element or concluding its absence.

**1. Search Space Reduction**:

- In each step, binary search reduces the search space by half. If you start with nnn elements, after one step, you will have n/2n/2n/2 elements to search, then n/4n/4n/4, n/8n/8n/8, and so on.

**2. Number of Steps**:

- The number of steps required to reduce the search space to 1 element (or to determine that the target is not present) can be represented as log2n\log_2 nlog2n. This is because each step divides the remaining elements by 2.

**3. Mathematical Representation**:

- The total number of comparisons needed in the worst case is the number of times the search space is divided until only one element is left. This count is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, where nnn is the number of elements in the array.

**4. Worst-Case Complexity**:

**Worst Case for Presence**: If the target element is at the very end of the search or requires checking all the divisions before finding it, the number of comparisons required will be log2n\log_2 nlog2n.

**Worst Case for Absence**: If the target element is not present, binary search will also need to perform log2n\log_2 nlog2n comparisons before concluding that the element is absent.

Consider a sorted array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], and you are searching for the target 10:

**1. Initial State**:

- Low = 0, high = 9 (total elements are 10).

**2. Step-by-Step Breakdown**:

**First Step**: mid = 4 (element 5). Since 10 > 5, update low to 5.

**Second Step**: mid = 7 (element 8). Since 10 > 8, update low to 8.

**Third Step**: mid = 8 (element 9). Since 10 > 9, update low to 9.

**Fourth Step**: mid = 9 (element 10). The target ten is found.

The total number of steps is 4, which is log210≈3.32\log_2 ten \approx 3.32log210≈3.32. This illustrates the logarithmic nature of binary search in the worst case.

The binary search algorithm is a highly efficient method for finding an element in a sorted array or list. It works by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half and comparing the target value to the middle element of the interval. Here's a detailed explanation of how it operates:

**Binary Search Algorithm**:

**1. Initialization**:

- Set two pointers or indices: low (initially set to the start index of the array, typically 0) and high (initially set to the last index of the array, which is n - 1, where n is the number of elements).

**2. Compute Middle Index**:

- Calculate the middle index mid of the current search interval using: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high
- In some programming languages, you might use integer division to ensure mid is an integer.

**3. Comparison**:

Compare the target value with the element at index mid:

**If**the target value is equal to the element at mid, the search is successful, and the index mid is returned.

**If**the target value is less than the element at mid, adjust the high pointer to mid-1 to search the left half of the array.

**If**the target value is greater than the element at mid, adjust the low pointer to mid + 1 to search the right half of the array.

**4. Repeat**:

- Continue the process with the updated low and high pointers until the target value is found or the low pointer exceeds the high pointer, indicating that the target is not in the array.

**5. Return**:

- If the target is found, return the index of the target element.

- If the search interval is exhausted (low > high) and the target is not found, return an indication that the target is not in the array (such as -1 or null).

Let’s consider an example where you want to search for the number 7 in a sorted array [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11].

**1. Initial State**:

- Low = 0, high = 5 (length of the array - 1)

**2. First Iteration**:

**Calculate mid:**mid=0+52=2\text{mid} = \frac{0 + 5}{2} = 2mid=20+5=2

- The element at index 2 is 5. Since 7 > 5, adjust low to mid + 1, which is 3.

**3. Second Iteration**:s

**Calculate mid:**mid=3+52=4\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 5}{2} = 4mid=23+5=4

- The element at index 4 is 9. Since 7 < 9, adjust high to mid-1, which is 3.

**4. Third Iteration**:

**Calculate mid:**mid=3+32=3\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 3}{2} = 3mid=23+3=3

- The element at index 3 is 7, which matches the target. The search is successful, and index three is returned.

Binary search is a fundamental algorithm used to find a target value within a sorted array or list. It operates efficiently by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half, making it much faster than linear search for large datasets. Here’s a basic overview of binary search:

**Sorted Array Requirement**:

- Binary search only works on sorted arrays or lists. The sorting allows the algorithm to make informed decisions about which half of the array to search next.

**Search Interval**:

- The search interval is the portion of the array currently being considered. Initially, it includes the entire array.

**1. Initialization**:

**Low Pointer**(low): Set to the start index of the array (usually 0).

**High Pointer**(high): Set to the end index of the array (length of the array minus one).

**2. Compute Middle Index**:

- Calculate the middle index of the current search interval: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high

- In integer-based programming languages, this is often implemented with integer division to avoid fractional indices.

**3. Comparison**:

Compare the target value with the element at the middle index:

**If**the target equals the middle element, return the middle index as the position of the target.

**If**the target is less than the middle element, adjust the search interval to the left half (update high to mid - 1).

**If**the target is greater than the middle element, adjust the search interval to the right half (update low to mid + 1).

**4. Repeat**:

- Continue the process with the updated low and high pointers until the target is found or the search interval is empty (low exceeds high).

**5. Termination**:

- If the target is found, return its index.

- If the search interval becomes invalid (i.e., low > high), return an indication that the target is not present in the array (e.g., -1).

Consider the sorted array [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11], and you want to find the target value 7.

**Initial State**:

- low = 0

- high = 5 (last index)

**First Iteration**:

**Calculate mid:**mid=0+52=2\text{mid} = \frac{0 + 5}{2} = 2mid=20+5=2

- The element at index 2 is 5. Since 7 > 5, update low to mid + 1, which is 3.

**Second Iteration**:

**Calculate mid:**mid=3+52=4\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 5}{2} = 4mid=23+5=4

- The element at index 4 is 9. Since 7 < 9, update high to mid-1, which is 3.

**Third Iteration**:

**Calculate mid:**mid=3+32=3\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 3}{2} = 3mid=23+3=3

- The element at index 3 is 7, which matches the target. Return index 3.

**1. Efficiency**:

**Time Complexity**: O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) — Because each step halves the search space, the number of operations grows logarithmically with the size of the array.**Space Complexity**: O(1)O(1)O(1) for iterative binary search, O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) for recursive binary search due to the call stack.

**2. Limitations**:

**Sorted Data**: Binary search requires the array to be sorted. If the array is not sorted, the binary search will not work correctly.

**3. Applications**:

- Binary search is used in various applications including searching in databases, implementing algorithms in computer science (e.g., searching algorithms), and other scenarios requiring efficient search operations.

Binary search is an efficient algorithm used to find a target value in a sorted array or list. It works by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. Here's a step-by-step overview of how binary search operates:

**1. Initialization**:

**Pointers**: Set two pointers, low and high:

- Low is initialized to the start index of the array (0).

- high is initialized to the end index of the array (length of the array minus one).

**2. Compute the Middle Index**:

- Calculate the middle index mid of the current search interval: mid=low+high2\text{mid} = \frac{\text{low} + \text{high}}{2}mid=2low+high

- Note: In some programming languages, ensure integer division is used to avoid fractional indices.

**3. Compare the Target with the Middle Element**:

Check the element at index mid:

**If the target is equal to the middle element**, The search is successful. Return the index mid.

**If the target is less than the middle element**, The target must be in the left half of the array. Update high to mid - 1 to focus on the left subarray.

**If the target is greater than the middle element**, The target must be in the right half of the array. Update low to mid + 1 to focus on the right subarray.

**4. Repeat**:

Continue the process with the updated low and high pointers until:

- The target is found.

- The search interval becomes invalid (low exceeds high), indicating the target is not in the array.

**5. Return**:

- If the target is found, return its index.

- If the search interval is exhausted and the target is not found, return an indication of failure (e.g., -1 or null).

Consider searching for the number 7 in the sorted array [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11].

**Initial State**:

- low = 0, high = 5 (last index)

**First Iteration**:

**Compute mid:**mid=0+52=2\text{mid} = \frac{0 + 5}{2} = 2mid=20+5=2

- The element at index 2 is 5. Since 7 > 5, update low to mid + 1 (3).

**Second Iteration**:

**Compute mid:**mid=3+52=4\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 5}{2} = 4mid=23+5=4

- The element at index 4 is 9. Since 7 < 9, update high to mid - 1 (3).

**Third Iteration**:

**Compute mid:**mid=3+32=3\text{mid} = \frac{3 + 3}{2} = 3mid=23+3=3

- The element at index 3 is 7, which matches the target. Return index 3.

When analyzing the space complexity of binary search, it’s important to differentiate between the iterative and recursive implementations of the algorithm. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

**Algorithm Overview**:

**Initialization**: Set low, high, and mid pointers.

**Loop**: Continue adjusting low and high within a while loop until the target is found or the interval becomes invalid.

**Space Complexity Analysis**:

**Space Complexity**: O(1)O(1)O(1)

**Explanation**:

- The iterative binary search uses a fixed amount of extra space regardless of the size of the input array.

- It only requires space for a few variables: low, high, mid, and possibly the target value.

- No additional data structures or significant memory allocations are used beyond these variables.

**Algorithm Overview**:

**Initialization**: Set low, high, and mid pointers.

**Recursion**: Perform the recursive calls to search the left or right half of the array.

**Space Complexity Analysis**:

**Space Complexity**: O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn)

**Explanation**:

- In the recursive version, each recursive call adds a new frame to the call stack.

- The maximum depth of the recursion is proportional to the number of times the array can be divided by two until only one element remains.

- This depth is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, where nnn is the number of elements in the array.

- Thus, the space complexity is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) due to the space needed for the call stack.

**1. Variables**:

- Uses a constant number of variables (low, high, mid).

- These variables occupy a fixed amount of space, independent of the size of the array.

**2. Memory Usage**:

- The amount of memory used does not grow with the input size.

- Therefore, the space complexity remains constant, O(1)O(1)O(1).

**1. Call Stack**:

- Each recursive call adds a new frame to the call stack.

- For binary search, the maximum depth of recursion is log2n\log_2 nlog2n, as each call processes a smaller portion of the array.

**2. Memory Usage**:

- The total space used by the call stack is proportional to the depth of recursion.

- Hence, the space complexity due to the recursive call stack is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn).

Binary search is a highly efficient algorithm for finding a target value within a sorted array, leveraging a divide-and-conquer approach. By repeatedly halving the search interval, it narrows down the possible locations of the target, resulting in a time complexity of O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn). This efficiency arises from the algorithm’s ability to discard half of the remaining elements in each step, making it significantly faster than linear search for large datasets.

While the iterative version of binary search maintains a constant space complexity of O(1)O(1)O(1), the recursive version requires O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) space due to the call stack. Thus, binary search is particularly effective for applications involving sorted data, where its logarithmic time complexity ensures rapid searches and minimal memory usage.

👇 Instructions

Copy and paste below code to page Head section

What is binary search?

Binary search is an algorithm used to find a target value in a sorted array by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. It compares the target with the middle element of the interval and narrows the search based on whether the target is less than or greater than the middle element.

What are the prerequisites for binary search?

The primary prerequisite is that the array or list must be sorted. Binary search relies on this sorted order to efficiently eliminate half of the search space in each step.

What is the time complexity of binary search?

The time complexity of the binary search is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn). This is because the algorithm divides the search space in half with each step, leading to logarithmic growth in the number of operations relative to the size of the array.

What is the space complexity of binary search?

The space complexity is O(1)O(1)O(1) for the iterative version of binary search, as it uses a constant amount of extra space. For the recursive version, the space complexity is O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) due to the additional memory required for the call stack.

How does binary search differ from linear search?

Binary search is more efficient than linear search for large datasets. While linear search has a time complexity of O(n)O(n)O(n) and checks each element sequentially, binary search reduces the search space by half in each step, resulting in O(logn)O(\log n)O(logn) time complexity. However, binary search requires the data to be sorted, whereas linear search does not.

Can binary search be used on unsorted arrays?

No, binary search cannot be used on unsorted arrays. The algorithm relies on the data being sorted to eliminate half of the search space with each step correctly. For unsorted data, binary search is only applicable with first sorting the array, which could affect overall efficiency.

Get a 1:1 Mentorship call with our Career Advisor

Book free session