In a world increasingly reliant on databases, data plays an essential role in various aspects of life. Databases are collections of organized information, allowing for efficient storage, retrieval, and manipulation of data. Thousands of operations happen at once; maintaining data accuracy is difficult. That’s where Serializability comes in; it ensures concurrent transactions don’t interfere with one another and the database remains consistent, just like they were executed one at a time.
Serializability is essential in a database management system because it helps ensure data consistency during concurrent transactions. While anomalies like dirty reads are typically discussed under isolation levels, serializability ensures such issues are avoided entirely. These mistakes can lead to incorrect results and can be challenging to debug.
In this blog, we will discuss the meaning of serializability schedule in DBMS, as well as its types, benefits, and disadvantages. We will also discuss the types of serializability and some examples to understand serializability in DBMS. Before moving forward on to the topic, let us first understand what serializability is in DBMS.
The serializability of schedules allows a non-serial schedule to be equivalent to a serial schedule. Serializability permits interleaved transaction execution, but ensures the final state is as if transactions were executed serially.
Even if transactions happen at the same time, the database system ensures that their combined effect is the same as if they were executed one after another in some order.
It is a fundamental concept in database management systems to ensure data accuracy and maintain the ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties.
There are two types of schedules in DBMS
In DBMS, schedules define the order in which multiple transaction operations are executed. They track the sequence of actions, like reading and writing data, performed by various transactions. Schedules can be categorized into two types serial or non-serial schedules.
A serial schedule is one in which transactions are executed one after another, with no interleaving. It is a schedule in which only one transaction is executed at a time, i.e., one transaction is executed completely before beginning another transaction.
A serial schedule ensures no conflicts between operations from various transactions since the transactions run one after another without overlapping.
A non-serial schedule is one where transactions are executed concurrently, meaning their operations are interleaved.
Non-serial schedules require additional analysis to ensure that they maintain database consistency.
Serializability in a DBMS ensures the correct parallel execution of transactions by requiring that the outcome of concurrent transactions be equivalent to some serial execution order. Integrity is maintained by treating each transaction as the only one active.
Concurrency control is a method used by DBMSs to accomplish serializability. This technique helps ensure that multiple transactions do not interfere with each other’s execution by controlling their access to shared resources.
These shared data can be database tables and records. Even with high continuous usage, the DBMS guarantees the accuracy and consistency of the database by preserving serializability.
In the DBMS (Database Management System), there are two types of serializability: conflict serializability and view serializability.
Both ensure that concurrent transactions result in a final database state that is equivalent to one produced by some serial execution, there by maintaining data consistency. There are two ways to check whether any non-serial schedule is serializable.
Conflict serializability determines whether a schedule can be transformed into a serial schedule by exchanging non-conflicting operations, maintaining the database's consistency. It ensures that relative order of conflicting operations is maintained to prevent data inconsistencies.
This involves checking for conflicts serializability where transactions access the same data item in opposite ways like one transaction is writing while another reads. It depends on the operation order and data item access, not on any unique value of transactions. Because conflicting operations cannot be reordered freely care must be taken to preserve their relative order to ensure consistency.
Let’s take two examples: an order table and a customer table. Even though a single client may place orders, each order is linked to a specific consumer. Whether conflict serializability is possible depends on the particular schedule of operations, not on the database schema itself.
Three transactions t1, t2, and t3, are active on a schedule “S” simultaneously. Let’s create a graph of precedence. If the precedence graph has no cycles the schedule is conflict-serializable and equivalent to some serial schedule. We can also determine the order of transactions because it is a serial schedule.
There is no incoming edge on Transaction 1. Transaction 1 will be executed first, and T3 will run second because it only depends on T1. Due to its dependence on both T1 and T3, t2 will finally be executed. Therefore, the serial schedule equivalent order is t1→t3→t2.
View serializability is an important concept in database concurrency control. It ensures that even when multiple transactions execute simultaneously, the result is equivalent to the result of these transactions running one after another in some specific serial order.
Concurrent transaction execution is used in database systems to increase system performance and resource utilization. View serializability guarantees that the results of concurrent transactions will be the same as those obtained if the transactions were carried out in a particular order and one at a time.
It checks whether a non-serial schedule reads and writes data in a way that is consistent with some serial schedule, including read-from relationships and final writes.
View serializability is define based on three key conditions.
Some schedules are not conflict serializable but still have consistent results. Conflict serializability is limited when the precedence graph of a schedule contains a cycle.
Precedence graph also known as conflict graph or serialization graph is a graph used to test for conflict serializability of a schedule. It helps to find if a schedule of database transactions can be executed in a serial order without causing any discord.
Method 1: View Equivalent or equivalent schedules
Method 2: Conflict serializability and blind writers
If a given schedule is found to be view equivalent to some serial schedule, then it is called a view serializable schedule. View equivalence is also based purely on reads and writes alone. There are three main conditions for view equivalence between two schedules
Let S and S1 be two schedules with the same set of transactions. S and S1 are view equivalent if the following three conditions are met.
1. For each data item Q, if transaction Ti reads the initial value of Q in schedule S, then transaction Ti must, in schedule S1, also read the initial value of Q. This is the Initial reads condition.
It ensures that if a transaction reads the value of Q before any writers in schedule s, it must do the same in S1.
2. For each data item Q, if transaction Ti executes read(Q) in schedule S, and that value was produced by transaction Tj (if any), then transaction Ti must, in schedule S1, also read the value of Q that was produced by transaction Tj. This is read from condition or updated read. It guarantees that the read operation must read from the same write in both schedules.
3. For each data item Q, the transaction, if any, that performs the final write (Q) operations in schedule S must perform the final write (Q) operation in schedule S1.
This is the final write condition. This ensures the same transaction performs the last write on Q in both schedules.
Another method to check view serializability starts by testing conflict serializability through a precedence graph and then checking for blind writers.
1. Test for conflict serializability
A schedule S is view serializable if it is view equivalent to a serial schedule. Every conflict serializable schedule is also view serializable, but not vice versa. This is because conflict equivalence is a more rigid condition than view equivalence.
2. Check for Blind writers
A schedule that is view serializable but not conflict serializable. The key point in this schedule is that it contains blind writes (a write not preceded by a read on the same data item), which prevents detection of conflicts but preserves view equivalence.
Every view-serializable schedule that is not conflict-serializable has blind writers. A blind write is a write X operation not preceded by any read(x) in the same transaction.
Schedules S1 and S2 must satisfy these requirements to be considered equivalent.
View serializability refers is the property of a schedule being veiw equivalent to some serial schedule. We have a schedule “S” with two concurrently running transactions “t1” and “t2.”
Schedule - S
By switching between both transaction mid-read-write operations, let’s create its view-equivalent schedule (S’)
After learning about the meaning and types of serializability in DBMS, let's have a look at some of its benefits.
Common concurrency problems include lost updates, uncommitted data, and irregular reads that lead to wrong data and damaged databases.
Serializability helps fix these problems. By permitting transactions to appear as if they were executed out serially, the database preserves a consistent and trustworthy representation of the data.
Serializability helps prevent data loss or corruption caused by concurrency issues, assuming the system correctly implements serializable isolation.
However, even with serializability correctly implemented, data loss or corruption can still occur due to other problems unrelated to concurrency, like hardware failure or bugs in the application logic.
While serializability improves correctness, it often comes at a higher resource cost compared to weaker isolation levels.
It also lowers the price of developing the software by making it easier to reason about code and reducing the need for extensive testing with multiple threads running concurrently.
Although serializability ensures correctness, it often comes with a performance trade-off compared to weaker isolation levels.
Although serializability restricts concurrency to preserve correctness, it still allows safe interleaving of transactions where possible, ensuring data integrity.
The disadvantages of serializability in DBMS are
Serializability testing in a database management system ensures that concurrent transactions produce the same results as if executed in some serial order, thereby preserving data consistency and integrity.
If they were executed in a single sequential order, data consistency and integrity would be guaranteed. Let’s consider an example to better understand how serializability works in a database management system.
Suppose two users, Ram and Rahem, are executing two transactions each: T1 and T2 for Ram and T3 and T4 for Rahem. T1 reads and writes data item X, and T2 reads and writes data item Y. T3 reads and writes data item Z, and T4 reads and writes data item W.
A schedule that satisfied conflict serializability is guaranteed to be serializable, though some serializable schedules may not be conflict serializable. In our example schedule above, notice that transaction 1 (T1) and transaction 2 (T2) read data item y before writing it. This may cause a conflict depending on how their operations are interleaved. Depending on the interleaving of operations on Y, the schedule has a chance of being conflict serializable.
View serializability is more relaxed but still needs the schedule to preserve the same read from relationships and final writes as a serial schedule. View serializability requires that a schedule preserves the same read from relationship and final writes as some serial schedule, even if transactions are interleaved. In our example, transaction 2 (t2) cannot see any updates made by transaction 4 (t4) because they do not share common data items.
While T2 and T4 don’t conflict whether, the entire schedule is view serializable depends on the overall read-from and final-write consistency. Conflict serializability is a stronger property than view serializability because all potential conflicts must be resolved before any updates are made. View serializability needs the same read-from and final-write behavior as a serial schedule, even if some conflicts exist. Moreover, these properties are necessary for ensuring correctness in concurrent transactions in a database management system.
Serializability is essential in database management systems because it assures data consistency and integrity when various transactions are executed concurrently.
For performance optimization various transactions frequently operate concurrently. While concurrency improves performance it can introduce data inconsistency problems if not properly managed.
Serializability ensures that even when transactions are executed concurrently, the database remains consistent producing results equivalent to a serial execution of these transactions. All of this is crucial for preserving data accuracy and dependability, which is frequently necessary for numerous regulatory and business applications.
Copy and paste below code to page Head section
View serializability ensures that even though transactions run concurrently, their outcome will be identical to the result achieved if the transactions were executed one by one in a special order.
In DBMS, locking is a mechanism for managing concurrent access to data by multiple users or transactions. It guarantees data integrity and consistency by controlling who can read or write data at a given time.
In DBMS, a schema is a database's overall structural plan or blueprint, defining how data is organized, related, and stored. It outlines the logical organization of the database, including entities, attributes, releationships and sometimes access permissions.
Data integrity means data's accuracy, completeness, and consistency throughout its lifecycle. It guarantees that data is reliable and trustworthy, free from error, unauthorized changes, or loss.
In DBMS, a key is a field or a set of fields used to uniquely identify each row in a table. Keys are necessary for establishing relationships between tables, enforcing data integrity and allowing data retrieval.
ACID stands for atomicity, consistency, isolation and durability and it is a set of properties that ensure reliable processing of database transactions. If a database operation has the ACID properties, it can be called an ACID transaction, and data storage systems that apply these operations are called transactional systems.
